0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.36	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:47:52 UTC 2026
0.09/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.14/0.40	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.14/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.smpzhEowly/E---3.1_2329023.p
473.57/88.38	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
473.57/88.38	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
473.57/88.38	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
473.57/88.38	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
473.57/88.38	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 2329038 completed with status 9
473.57/88.38	% post_as_ho10 with pid 2329039 completed with status 9
473.57/88.38	% sh2lt with pid 2329037 completed with status 0
473.57/88.38	% Result found by sh2lt
473.57/88.38	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
473.57/88.38	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
473.57/88.38	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
473.57/88.38	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
473.57/88.38	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
473.57/88.38	% Search class: HGHSS-FFMF22-SHHFFSBN
473.57/88.38	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
473.57/88.38	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2329047 completed with status 10
473.57/88.38	% Starting sh2lt with 19s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% sh2lt with pid 2329051 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 2329061 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting new_bool_2 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% new_bool_2 with pid 2329065 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting new_bool_9 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% new_bool_9 with pid 2329070 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% ho_unfolding_6 with pid 2329080 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 76s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% lpo8_lambda_fix with pid 2329090 completed with status 0
473.57/88.38	% Result found by lpo8_lambda_fix
473.57/88.38	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
473.57/88.38	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
473.57/88.38	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
473.57/88.38	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
473.57/88.38	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
473.57/88.38	% Search class: HGHSS-FFMF22-SHHFFSBN
473.57/88.38	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
473.57/88.38	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2329047 completed with status 10
473.57/88.38	% Starting sh2lt with 19s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% sh2lt with pid 2329051 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 2329061 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting new_bool_2 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% new_bool_2 with pid 2329065 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting new_bool_9 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% new_bool_9 with pid 2329070 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 17s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% ho_unfolding_6 with pid 2329080 completed with status 8
473.57/88.38	% Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 76s (1) cores
473.57/88.38	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
473.57/88.38	% Presaturation interreduction done
473.57/88.38	
473.57/88.38	% Proof found!
473.57/88.38	% SZS status Theorem
473.57/88.38	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_26, type, esk3_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_27, type, esk4_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_28, type, esk5_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_29, type, esk6_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(decl_30, type, esk7_0: $i > $i).
473.57/88.38	thf(cTHM112B, conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8))))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4))))<=(![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X6 @ X4)|(X2 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.smpzhEowly/E---3.1_2329023.p', cTHM112B)).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8))))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4))))<=(![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X6 @ X4)|(X2 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4)))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM112B])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X6 @ X4)|(X2 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4))))=>(![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8))))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X20:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X21:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X25:$i, X26:$i]:((((((X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|(X20 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&((X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|(X20 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&(((~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|(epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|(epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&((~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))))&((((X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|(X20 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&((X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|(X20 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&(((~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|(epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|(epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&((~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X30:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X30)=(X30))), introduced(definition)).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X49:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X49)=(X49))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X50:$i, X51:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X52:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((esk6_2 @ X52 @ X51 @ X50)=(esk2_2 @ X51 @ X52 @ (esk3_2 @ X51 @ X52 @ X50)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2)=(esk7_0))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_6])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X4)=(X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:(((esk6_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2 @ X4)=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2) @ X5))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X29:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ X29)=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ X29)))), introduced(definition)).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2 @ X4)=(esk6_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X4))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2) @ X5))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((~((((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true))))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4]), c_0_14])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true))))|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4]), c_0_14])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4))))) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_15])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2)=(esk6_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2) @ X4))), inference(pos_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((((esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(esk7_0))|((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(X4)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2) @ X4)|((esk6_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))!=(esk7_0))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_13])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(X4))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])])]), c_0_23])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true))))|~((((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4]), c_0_14])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((esk3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(esk7_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X2 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(esk7_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_30])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((epred1_0 @ (esk4_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32])])])).
473.57/88.38	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_33])]), c_0_32])])]), ['proof']).
473.57/88.38	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
473.57/88.38	% Parsed axioms                        : 1
473.57/88.38	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
473.57/88.38	% Initial clauses                      : 14
473.57/88.38	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
473.57/88.38	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
473.57/88.38	% Processed clauses                    : 89
473.57/88.38	% ...of these trivial                  : 1
473.57/88.38	% ...subsumed                          : 17
473.57/88.38	% ...remaining for further processing  : 71
473.57/88.38	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 26
473.57/88.38	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
473.57/88.38	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
473.57/88.38	% Backward-rewritten                   : 2
473.57/88.38	% Generated clauses                    : 164
473.57/88.38	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102
473.57/88.38	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
473.57/88.38	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
473.57/88.38	% Paramodulations                      : 81
473.57/88.38	% Factorizations                       : 0
473.57/88.38	% NegExts                              : 12
473.57/88.38	% Equation resolutions                 : 31
473.57/88.38	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
473.57/88.38	% Total rewrite steps                  : 22
473.57/88.38	% ...of those cached                   : 5
473.57/88.38	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional check models        : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
473.57/88.38	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
473.57/88.38	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
473.57/88.38	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
473.57/88.38	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
473.57/88.38	% Current number of processed clauses  : 51
473.57/88.38	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
473.57/88.38	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
473.57/88.38	%    Negative unit clauses             : 0
473.57/88.38	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 44
473.57/88.38	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
473.57/88.38	% ...number of literals in the above   : 110
473.57/88.38	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
473.57/88.38	% Current number of archived clauses   : 20
473.57/88.38	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 418
473.57/88.38	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 301
473.57/88.38	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
473.57/88.38	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
473.57/88.38	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
473.57/88.38	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
473.57/88.38	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
473.57/88.38	% Condensation attempts                : 89
473.57/88.38	% Condensation successes               : 0
473.57/88.38	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 15659
473.57/88.38	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 346
473.57/88.38	
473.57/88.38	% -------------------------------------------------
473.57/88.38	% User time                : 86.225 s
473.57/88.38	% System time              : 0.838 s
473.57/88.38	% Total time               : 87.062 s
473.57/88.38	% Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
473.57/88.38	
473.57/88.38	% -------------------------------------------------
473.57/88.38	% User time                : 224.340 s
473.57/88.38	% System time              : 3.067 s
473.57/88.38	% Total time               : 227.406 s
473.57/88.38	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
473.57/88.38	% E exiting
473.57/88.39	EOF